Air Monitoring
COMPARISON OF METHODOLOGIES FOR CONTINUOUS, AUTOMATIC EMISSION DUST MONITORING
Oct 06 2014
Author: Roland Zepeck on behalf of CEM
Introduction
Automatic monitoring for particulates in gaseous medias is a special challenge, as the required answer from the monitors is a signal of Concentration, however, the matter to be detected is a mixture of two phases (stack gas = gaseous phase, particulates = solid phase), and such a mixture never can be ideal. Therefore in-situ methods avoiding the extraction of sample gas for measurement have a significant advantage over extractive methods. For extractive methods (including the reference method Isokinetic Gravimetric Sampling) the position of the extraction point (= representative point) is of vital importance for the accuracy of the measurement.
For automatic monitoring various methodologies are available. In general they can be grouped into several, partially also overlapping, groups:
Qualitative and Quantitative Methods
In-situ and Extractive Methods
Electrical and Optical Methods
Optical methods can be sub-grouped into Light-Transmission and Light-Scattering Methods.
Digital Edition
AET 28.2 April/May 2024
May 2024
Business News - Teledyne Marine expands with the acquisition of Valeport - Signal partners with gas analysis experts in Korea Air Monitoring - Continuous Fine Particulate Emission Monitor...
View all digital editions
Events
Jul 10 2024 Birmingham, UK
Jul 21 2024 Cape Town, South Africa
Australasian Waste & Recycling Expo
Jul 24 2024 Sydney, Australia
Jul 30 2024 Jakarta, Indonesia
China Energy Summit & Exhibition
Jul 31 2024 Beijing, China